Articles on Confucianism and Just War

Two articles on Confucianism and Just War have been published in the latest Philosophy Compass:


2 replies on “Articles on Confucianism and Just War”

  1. I suppose war is always regarded as just by one side or another. It depends on who is the aggressor against whom. A hardcore pacifist might insist that no war is justified but matters are always more complicated. Economic and ideological pressures have long been foundations for warfare: if someone has more of something than someone else and that someone wants a bigger piece of that pie, there is bound to be trouble. Blood shed is not a deterrent when taking is more expedient than earning. Warfare, similar to self-defense, is in our genes; the fight-or-flight response of other life forms is based in self-preservation. Humans make war because they can and someone always wants the stuff someone else has.

  2. I cannot access the articles, but should one want to put this material in a larger comparative context, my bibliography would be a good place to start:

    Also, betwixt and between so-called pacifism (Gandhian non-violence well explains how and why this term can be misleading) and just war, there is what Larry May (perhaps the foremost philosopher on international criminal justice and law) call “contingent pacifism,” which I suspect identifies a viewpoint many us can or do subscribe to: Larry May, Contingent Pacifism: Revisiting Just War Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2015).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.