Bloomington, Indiana was the site of the 8th Midwest Conference on Chinese Thought, which took place last Friday to Sunday. Our hosts at the University of Indiana (primarily Aaron Stalnaker, Maichel Ing, and Cheryl Cottine of the Religious Studies Department) organized things very well. The group was small enough that everyone was able to participate, but large enough that there was a critical mass to discuss a wide range of topics intelligently. As compared with the more narrowly philosophical conferences that I have mostly been attending, there was a refreshing dose of sinology (details of texts, less-well-known authors, etc.); too bad that the AAS doesn’t seem to be more open to broad discussions of Chinese thought, because it might then be more of a forum for conversations like this one. Two of my personal highlights were Esther Klein’s paper “Sima Qian’s Confucius and the Western Han Lunyu,” which both reviewed recent research on the possible Western Han composition of the Lunyu and presented her own research into citations of the Lunyu in Shiji; and Frank Perkins’s “The Mohist Daodejing,” which explored parallels between the last 16 chapters of the Daodejing (which are unattested in the Guodian texts) and Mohism. Both papers hint at further ways in which our understanding of early Chinese thought may continue to change in dramatic ways in years ahead!
Warp, Weft, and Way is a group blog of Chinese and Comparative philosophy. Its primary purpose is to promote and stimulate discussion of Chinese philosophy and cross-tradition inquiry among scholars and students of philosophy, whatever their level of training. Contributors include active scholars with a variety of philosophical interests and approaches.
Contributors Stephen Angle and Manyul Im administer the blog behind the scenes. Any questions or requests regarding the blog and its operations may be directed to them. Contact information is available under their entries on the Contributor page. In order to maintain a dynamic conversational quality, discussion comments are not initially moderated. As a policy and a courtesy to other participants, comment or discussion authors must identify themselves with their first and last names. Exceptions will be made by request only to one of the administrators. If the blog administrators are unable to contact and verify identity, entries will be removed. While a SPAM robot stands guard to prevent obvious intrusions, the administrators reserve the right to judge the appropriateness of any posted comment.
Warp, Weft, and Way is an academic venture. Neither the administrators nor the contributors profit financially from its contents.
NOTE: Any quoted material from the blog that is published elsewhere must be properly cited, according to professional standards, for example as outlined here. Posts and comments are the intellectual property of their contributors.
Like us for New Post updates on your Facebook feed!
Recent Comments on Blog Posts
- O Sangjin on Olberding on Tien
- Heng Du on Xing Wen argues that Beida Laozi is a Forgery
- Michael Ing on Zhao Hired by Whitman
- Bill Haines on Question about family and society in the Chinese philosophical tradition
- Margus Ott on Question about family and society in the Chinese philosophical tradition
- Manyul Im on World Congress of Philosophy 2018 in Beijing
- Raj Kishor Prasad on World Congress of Philosophy 2018 in Beijing
- Prof. Dr. Suman Kanti Barua on World Congress of Philosophy 2018 in Beijing
- Bill Haines on Van Norden on the Confucian Roots of Xi Jinping’s Thought
- Kai Marchal on Van Norden on the Confucian Roots of Xi Jinping’s Thought
- Surendra Singh Virhe on World Congress of Philosophy 2018 in Beijing
- beth ewing on ToC for Journal of Daoist Studies 11 (2018)
Site infoWarp, Weft, and Way
WordPress adaptation by Tara Aukerman | Original design by Andreas Viklund