Richard Marshall of the on-line magazine 3AM interviews Jay Garfield, one of the leading U.S. scholars of Buddhist and comparative philosophy. Garfield tells entertaining stories about his developing interests in philosophy and makes insightful comments about the past, present, and future of comparative / world philosophy. He says: “…there has been a lot of progress. But there is also a long way to go. People in our profession are still happy to treat Western philosophy as the “core” of the discipline, and as the umarked case. So, for instance, a course that addresses only classical Greek philosophy can be comfortably titled “Ancient Philosophy,” not “Ancient Western Philosophy,” and a course in metaphysics can be counted on to ignore all non-Western metaphysics. A course in Indian philosophy is not another course in the history of PHILOSOPHY, but is part of the non-Western curriculum. And many of the major journals in our field will not even seriously consider submissions that address non-Western literature. Until the literature, curriculum, professional meetings and mode of engagement with the literature is as diverse as the world of philosophy itself, there is a lot of work to do. And that work is a matter of both intellectual and moral imperative. It is simply irrational to ignore most of world philosophy in the pursuit of truth, and immoral to relegate any literature not written by Europeans as somehow beneath our dignity to read….”
Warp, Weft, and Way is a group blog of Chinese and Comparative philosophy. Its primary purpose is to promote and stimulate discussion of Chinese philosophy and cross-tradition inquiry among scholars and students of philosophy, whatever their level of training. Contributors include active scholars with a variety of philosophical interests and approaches.
Contributors Stephen Angle and Manyul Im administer the blog behind the scenes. Any questions or requests regarding the blog and its operations may be directed to them. Contact information is available under their entries on the Contributor page. In order to maintain a dynamic conversational quality, discussion comments are not initially moderated. As a policy and a courtesy to other participants, comment or discussion authors must identify themselves with their first and last names. Exceptions will be made by request only to one of the administrators. If the blog administrators are unable to contact and verify identity, entries will be removed. While a SPAM robot stands guard to prevent obvious intrusions, the administrators reserve the right to judge the appropriateness of any posted comment.
Warp, Weft, and Way is an academic venture. Neither the administrators nor the contributors profit financially from its contents.
NOTE: Any quoted material from the blog that is published elsewhere must be properly cited, according to professional standards, for example as outlined here. Posts and comments are the intellectual property of their contributors.
Like us for New Post updates on your Facebook feed!
Recent Comments on Blog Posts
- O Sangjin on Olberding on Tien
- Heng Du on Xing Wen argues that Beida Laozi is a Forgery
- Michael Ing on Zhao Hired by Whitman
- Bill Haines on Question about family and society in the Chinese philosophical tradition
- Margus Ott on Question about family and society in the Chinese philosophical tradition
- Manyul Im on World Congress of Philosophy 2018 in Beijing
- Raj Kishor Prasad on World Congress of Philosophy 2018 in Beijing
- Prof. Dr. Suman Kanti Barua on World Congress of Philosophy 2018 in Beijing
- Bill Haines on Van Norden on the Confucian Roots of Xi Jinping’s Thought
- Kai Marchal on Van Norden on the Confucian Roots of Xi Jinping’s Thought
- Surendra Singh Virhe on World Congress of Philosophy 2018 in Beijing
- beth ewing on ToC for Journal of Daoist Studies 11 (2018)
Site infoWarp, Weft, and Way
WordPress adaptation by Tara Aukerman | Original design by Andreas Viklund