TOC: Journal of Chinese Philosophy Volume 48 (2021): Issue 2 (June 2021)
Category Archives: Chinese philosophy – 中國哲學 – 中国哲学
2022 SEA International Young Scholars Conference
Dear colleagues,
The Research Center for Chinese Cultural Subjectivity in Taiwan (CCS) will be hosting the 2nd Sinophone Studies in Europe and the Americas (SEA) International Young Scholars Conference in March 2022 at National Chengchi University, Taiwan. We invite post-doctoral researcher, Ph. D. candidate, doctoral or master’s degree student in all related fields to discuss different research approaches with their Taiwanese counterparts.
The goal of the SEA 2022 conference is to re-think existing paradigms in fields and sub-fields like Asian Studies, Sinology, Transcultural Studies, Religion Studies, Applied Ethics, Comparative Literature and Philosophy, History of Thought, Global History, Digital Humanities, etc. One central question that we want to explore is how to understand the idea of (geographic, linguistic, conceptual) “border” in the global present, and how different Sinophone perspectives interrogate this and other related ideas, in particular with regard to the following topics:
- Categories and Boundaries in Transcultural Perspective.
- Inclusivity and Demarcation in Sinophone Religions.
- Sinophone Studies in Practical Horizon.
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice soliciting non-Western submissions
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice encourages submissions on non-western philosophical traditions, especially those that interface contemporary ethics and Asian philosophies. This is part of the editorial team’s ongoing efforts to expand the journal’s repertoire of traditions, ideas and approaches beyond what is typically considered to be mainstream ethics and practical philosophy, and to foster dialogue and engagement across cultures and methodologies. We also invite proposals for book reviews as well as for special issues that engage Asian philosophical traditions. Proposals for special issues are evaluated twice a year through our regular selection process, with deadlines on October 1 and April 1.
For more information about the journal, please visit https://www.springer.com/journal/10677
ToC: Comparative Political Theory Volume 1.1
Dear Colleagues,
The inaugural issue of Comparative Political Theory is now available. This new journal explicitly welcomes submissions dealing with East Asian thought. Please find the table of contents below as well as a link to the full text: HERE.
CFP: ISCP Group Panel at the 2021 APA Central Division
ToC:Journal of Chinese Humanities Volume 6.1; Special Issue: Reevaluating the Traditional Confucian Division between Mencius and Xunzi
Dear Colleagues,
The latest issue of the Journal of Chinese Humanities (JOCH) is now available. Please find the table of contents below as well as a link to the full text: HERE.
ToC:Asian Philosophy, Volume 31, Issue 3 (2021)
- Confucian freedom: assessing the debate By Robert A. Carleo III
- Did Confucius advise Zai Wo to do what he believed to be morally wrong? Interpreting Analects 17.21 By Mathew A. Foust
- Epistemic detachment from distinctions and debates: an investigation of yiming in the ‘qiwulun’ of the Zhuangzi By Fan He
- An Abhidharmic theory of welfare By Javier Hidalgo
- Differences and similarities between the later-Wittgenstein’s philosophy of religion and the Islamic mystical tradition By Vahid Taebnia
-
Zhuangzi’s evaluation of qing and its relationship to knowledge By Chiu Wai Wai
-
Quan Wang
CFP: 25th annual meeting of the Southeast Early China Roundtable, University of Florida, October 22 to 24 (in-person)
We welcome papers on pre-Song China from a variety of disciplinary perspectives, including anthropology, archaeology, art history, history, literature, philosophy, and religion. Please send short abstracts of individual papers (250 words) to Stephan N. Kory (skory@ufl.edu) by August 1, 2021. For all abstract submissions, please mark the subject line as “SEECR Submission 2021.”For more information about SEECR, please visit the SEECR website:
CFP: Chinese Political Thought. A Global Dialogue beyond “Orientalism”
January 20-21, 2022 (online)
Chinese philosophy is often considered as a pragmatic, intrinsically “political” discourse, more oriented towards the stabilization of a community (be it social, cultural or institutional) and the establishment of an organic, well-functioning state apparatus than to the understanding of the metaphysical realm of thought.
This is a largely biased and simplistic reduction of its thematic richness and its high level of theoretical sophistication, yet the formative centuries of Chinese thought – amidst the turmoil of the Warring States – undeniably urged the main intellectual actors of the time to a reflection on how to rebuild the lost “political order”.
And yet, even as China is becoming a global power, Chinese political thought is rarely allowed to participate in discussions beyond the disciplinary “wall” of Sinology and Asian Studies and their categories of thought. In other words, if Plato, Machiavelli or Rousseau are unanimously considered to speak the universal language of “political philosophy”, the reflections on power, authority and legitimacy offered by Laozi, Han Fei or Mencius tend to remained confined to a specialized (sometimes still considered and treated as “exotic”) Chinese context.
This workshop, jointly organized by the University of Naples “L’Orientale”- Centre for East Asian Studies, Tallinn University and EURICS-European Institute for Chinese Studies, intends to fill this gap and foster an interdisciplinary dialogue among disciplines by inviting sinologists, political philosophers, and intellectual historians to discuss Chinese political thought (of any period), favoring a focus on its comparative and/or global potential. Contributions focusing on more than one country, area, or period are also encouraged.
New Book: Interpreting Chinese Philosophy
Jana S. Rošker’s Interpreting Chinese Philosophy: A New Methodology has been published by Bloomsbury.
Understanding Chinese philosophy requires knowledge of the referential framework prevailing in Chinese intellectual traditions. But Chinese philosophical texts are frequently approached through the lens of Western paradigms. Analysing the most common misconceptions surrounding Western Sinology, Jana Rošker alerts us to unseen dangers and introduces us to a new more effective way of reading Chinese philosophy.
