(A reminder about this upcoming lecture this Friday, December 6.)
THE COLUMBIA SOCIETY FOR COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY
Welcomes:
BRYAN VAN NORDEN (Vassar College)
With responses from:
TIMOTHY CONNOLLY (East Stroudsburg University)
Please join us at Columbia University’s Religion department on Friday, December 6, 2013 at 5:30 for his lecture called:
“Truth and Argument in Ancient Chinese Philosophy”
ABSTRACT:
Most informed students of comparative Chinese-Western philosophy would agree with the following four claims: 
- Chinese philosophy is almost always concerned with truths that have ethical and social implications, whereas Western philosophy is sometimes concerned with purely theoretical puzzle-solving.
- Nonetheless, historically speaking, most Western philosophers have in fact been motivated to philosophize by ethical and social concerns. The trend toward theoretical puzzle-solving is largely characteristic of some 20th century philosophy, particularly in the English-speaking world.
- Aristotle invented the first form of formal, deductive logic in the West, whereas Chinese philosophers were much more interested in the complexities of ordinary language arguments.
- Nonetheless, philosophers in both China and the West give philosophical arguments – and sometimes structurally similar philosophical arguments – without needing to use formal logic.
Controversy remains, though, over the proper way to understand the role of “truth” in Chinese philosophy. Continue reading →