Category Archives: Chinese philosophy – 中國哲學 – 中国哲学

Ideas Wanted for "World Political Thought"

Yale University Press is exploring the possibility of a series called “World Political Thought,” the goal being to publish authoritative English-language editions of important works from the many traditions of political thinking outside of the Euro-American traditions that dominate political theory/political philosophy today. I’m serving as editor for the East Asian part of this project. One early step that we are considering is starting with low-hanging fruit: texts that exist already in obscure and/or out-of-print editions (maybe appended to someone’s dissertation?) that could be spruced up and republished, in order to get the series off the ground rapidly. (The more substantial project of commissioning translations of other texts will also get going, and proceed simultaneously.) Anyone have suggestions? For the time being, I’m mainly interested in the “low-hanging fruit,” but any and all ideas are welcome.

Opportunity for Graduate Students at Oxford

Call for Applications

Graduate Workshop: ‘Research Training in Old Chinese: Text and Textuality’

(Deadline — Friday, 11 June 2010)

Series convenor: Dr Dirk Meyer, The Queen’s College, University of Oxford (dirk.meyer@orinst.ox.ac.uk)
Workshop organizers: Dirk Meyer (dirk.meyer@orinst.ox.ac.uk), Dan Holloway (daniel.holloway@area.ox.ac.uk).

We invite applications from graduate students (at any level) for participation in a workshop, Research Training in Old Chinese: Text and Textuality. Continue reading →

Huainanzi Translation and Some Questions about Translation

I’m informed by the publicity editor for Columbia University Press that the new Huainanzi translation is out and that the translators are available to write something about it on this blog or to be interviewed. I’m not sure what kinds of things we might have them address as of yet since very few, if any, of us has had a chance to look at the volume. Any thoughts?

I did have a related set of questions about backgrounds of translators in general, ones that are relevant not only to our specialization but to others, which occurred to me in this context. Most ancient texts that interest philosophers tend to have been translated, at least into English, by non-philosophers — that is, by specialists who have specialized training in other fields than philosophy. Continue reading →